Journal of Aeronautical Engineering

Journal of Aeronautical Engineering

Reducing the Fluctuations of the Pitch Angle of a Dual-Spin Projectile Using State Machine and Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Faculty of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Malek-Ashtar University of Technology, Iran.
2 Faculty of Electrical and Computer, Malek-Ashtar University of Technology, Iran.
10.22034/joae.2024.370978.1144
Abstract
Today,with the advancement of technology and the emergence of smart weapons, the weapons of the past have practically lost their effectiveness. Therefore, we should look for a solution so that we can make them smart and bring them back to the battlefield without making many changes in the structure of the past ammunitions and prevent the destruction of national assets. In this regard,the idea of the guiding head has been proposed, which is known as the path correction fuse. This fuse is made separately and is installed in a two-wheeled manner on the cannon balls and mortars and takes charge of projectile guidance. An important challenge in common guidance algorithms for these fuses, due to the type of actuator, is the fluctuations of the end moments of the projectile flight. In this article, an innovative solution is presented to solve this important challenge, in this idea, a state machine is used to solve the performance problem of the PN guidance algorithm. The design parameters of the control, guidance and state machine parts have been calculated using the particle swarm optimization method with the fitness function, which includes the rate of elevation angle fluctuations (to eliminate the problem of elevation angle fluctuations) and the collision error rate. To validate the algorithm, Monte Carlo simulation has been performed. The simulation result shows that the proposed algorithm can reduce the CEP value of the projectile by three meters and at the same time the elevation angle does not fluctuate in the final moments.
Keywords

Subjects


[1] Gagnon E, Lauzon M. Low cost guidance and control solution for in-service unguided 155 mm artillery shell. Defence Research and Development Canada, DRDC-VALCARTIER-TR-2008-333. 2009.
[2] Reusch O, Kautzsch K, editors. Precision enhancement build on a multi functional fuze for 155mm artillery munition. Proceedings of the 47th NDIA Annual Fuze Conference (NDIA’03); 2003.
[3] Beattie R, editor UK Course Correction Fuze Research. 6th International Cannon Artillery Firepower Symposium & Exhibition; 2000.
[4] D'Amico W. Low-cost Competent Munitions (LCCM) Self-Correction Devices-An Initial Study and Status. US Army Research Laboratoiy, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, ARL-TR-1. 1996;178.
[5] Eroğlu M. Design and control of nose actuation kit for position correction of spin stabilized munitions under wind effect: Middle East Technical University; 2016.
[6] Fresconi F, Celmins I, Silton S, Costello M. High maneuverability projectile flight using low cost components. Aerospace Science and Technology. 2015;41:175-88.
[7] Theodoulis S, Gassmann V, Wernert P, Dritsas L, Kitsios I, Tzes A. Guidance and control design for a class of spin-stabilized fin-controlled projectiles. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics. 2013;36(2):517-31.
[8] Nobahari H, Arab Kermani M. Integrated Optimization of Guidance and Control Parameters in a Dual Spin Flying Vehicle. Scientia Iranica. 2017;24(5):2473-89.
[9] Zhu D, Tang S, Guo J, Chen R. Flight stability of a dual-spin projectile with canards. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering. 2015;229(4):703-16.
[10] Wernert P, Theodoulis S, Morel Y, editors. Flight dynamics properties of 155 mm spin-stabilized projectiles analyzed in different body frames. AIAA atmospheric flight mechanics conference; 2010.
[11] Wernert P, Theodoulis S, editors. Modelling and stability analysis for a class of 155 mm spin-stabilized projectiles with course correction fuse (CCF). AIAA atmospheric flight mechanics conference; 2011.
[12] Spagni J, Theodoulis S, Wernert P, editors. Flight control for a class of 155 mm spin-stabilized projectile with reciprocating canards. AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference; 2012.
[13] Seve F, Theodoulis S, Wernert P, Zasadzinski M, Boutayeb M. Flight dynamics modeling of dual-spin guided projectiles. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems. 2017;53(4):1625-41.
[14] Costello M, editor Modeling and simulation of a differential roll projectile. AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference and Exhibit; 1998.
[15] Theodoulis S, Sève F, Wernert P. Robust gain-scheduled autopilot design for spin-stabilized projectiles with a course-correction fuze. Aerospace Science and Technology. 2015;42:477-89.
[16] Zheng Q, Zhou Z. Flight Stability of Canard-Guided Dual-Spin Projectiles with Angular Rate Loops. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering. 2020;2020.
[17] Wernert P, editor Stability analysis for canard guided dual-spin stabilized projectiles. AIAA atmospheric flight mechanics conference; 2009.
[18] Wang Y, Wang X-m, Yu J-y. Influence of control strategy on stability of dual-spin projectiles with fixed canards. Defence technology. 2018;14(6):709-19.
[19] Norris J, Hameed A, Economou J, Parker S. A review of dual-spin projectile stability. Defence Technology. 2020;16(1):1-9.
[20] Zhang X, Xiaoxian Y, Zheng Q. Impact point prediction guidance based on iterative process for dual-spin projectile with fixed canards. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics. 2019;32(8):1967-81.
[21] Zhang Y, Gao M, Yang S, Fang D. An adaptive proportional navigation guidance law for guided mortar projectiles. The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation. 2016;13(4):467-75.
[22] Guo Q-w, Song W-d, Wang Y, Lu Z-c. Guidance law design for a class of dual-spin mortars. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering. 2015;2015.
[23] Liu P, Cao H, Feng S, Liu H, Cao L. Optimization of the PNG Law for a Dual-Spin Mortar with Fixed Canards. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. 2021;2021.
[24] Yuan P-J, Chern J-S. Ideal proportional navigation. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics. 1992;15(5):1161-5.
 
Volume 26, Issue 1
August 2024
Pages 97-110

  • Receive Date 20 November 2022
  • Revise Date 23 July 2023
  • Accept Date 14 May 2024