[1] Edel RK, Winn HE. Observations on underwater locomotion and flipper movement of the humpback whale Megaptera novaeangliae. Mar Biol 1978;48:279–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00397155.
[2] Perkins J, Whitehead H. Observations on Three Species of Baleen Whales off Northern Newfoundland and Adjacent Waters. J Fish Res Board Canada 1977;34:1436–40. https://doi.org/10.1139/f77-206.
[3] Fish FE, Howle LE, Murray MM. Hydrodynamic flow control in marine mammals. Integr Comp Biol 2008;48:788–800. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icn029.
[4] Fish FE, Battle JM. Hydrodynamic design of the humpback whale flipper. J Morphol 1995;225:51–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.1052250105.
[5] Watts P, Fish FE. The influence of passive, leading edge tubercles on wing performance. 2001.
[6] Miklosovic DS, Murray MM, Howle LE, Fish FE. Leading-edge tubercles delay stall on humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) flippers. Phys Fluids 2004;16. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1688341.
[7] Miklosovic DS, Murray MM, Howle LE. Experimental evaluation of sinusoidal leading edges. J. Aircr., vol. 44, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc.; 2007, p. 1404–8. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.30303.
[8] Weber PW, Howle LE, Murray MM, Miklosovic DS. Computational evaluation of the performance of lifting surfaces with leading-edge protuberances. J Aircr 2011;48:591–600. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C031163.
[9] Van Nierop EA, Alben S, Brenner MP. How bumps on whale flippers delay stall: An aerodynamic model. Phys Rev Lett 2008;100. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.054502.
[10] Esmaeili A, Delgado HEC, Sousa JMM. Numerical simulations of low-Reynolds-Number flow past finite wings with leading-Edge protuberances. J. Aircr., vol. 55, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc.; 2018, p. 226–38. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C034591.
[11] Johari H, Henoch C, Custodio D, Levshin A. Effects of leading-edge protuberances on airfoil performance. AIAA J 2007;45:2634–42. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.28497.
[12] Hansen KL, Kelso RM, Dally BB. Performance Variations of Leading-Edge Tubercles for Distinct Airfoil Profiles. Https://DoiOrg/102514/1J050631 2012;49:185–94. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J050631.
[13] Kelso R, Rostamzadeh N, Hansen K. Tubercle Geometric Configurations: Optimization and Alternatives. Flow Control Through Bio-inspired Leading-Edge Tubercles, Springer International Publishing; 2020, p. 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23792-9_3.
[14] Chaitanya P, Joseph P, Narayanan S, Vanderwel C, Turner J, Kim JW, et al. Performance and mechanism of sinusoidal leading edge serrations for the reduction of turbulence-aerofoil interaction noise. vol. 818. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2017.141.
[15] Esmaeili A, Delgado HEC, Sousa JMM. Numerical Simulations of Low-Reynolds-Number Flow Past Finite Wings with Leading-Edge Protuberances. Https://DoiOrg/102514/1C034591 2017;55:226–38. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C034591.
[16] Pereira JCF, Sousa JMM. Finite Volume Calculations of Self-Sustained Oscillations in a Grooved Channel. J Comput Phys 1993;106:19–29. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1993.1087.
[17] Kobayashi MH, Pereira JCF, Sousa JMM. Comparison of several open boundary numerical treatments for laminar recirculating flows. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 1993;16:403–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.1650160505.
[18] Langtry RB, Menter FR, Likki SR, Suzen YB, Huang PG, Völker S. A correlation-based transition model using local variables - Part II: Test cases and industrial applications. J Turbomach 2006;128:423–34. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2184353.
[19] Guerreiro JLE, Sousa JMM. Low-reynolds-number effects in passive stall control using sinusoidal leading edges. AIAA J 2012;50:461–9. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J051235.
[20] Ali Esmaeili. Experimental and Computational Investigation of Hybrid Passive-Active Stall Control for Micro Aerial Vehicles. UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA INSTITUTO SUPERIOR TÉCNICO, 2018.
)
